Beenish Nafees

1.6k total citations
33 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Beenish Nafees is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Beenish Nafees has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 6 papers in Surgery and 6 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Beenish Nafees's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers). Beenish Nafees is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers). Beenish Nafees collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Beenish Nafees's co-authors include Andrew Lloyd, Jessamy Watkins, Sarah Dewilde, Megan Stafford, María Gabriela Lorenzo, Narayan Rajan, Kristina S. Boye, Amier Ahmad, Adam Lloyd and Matthew D. Rousculp and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Thorax and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Beenish Nafees

32 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Beenish Nafees United Kingdom 15 630 513 337 167 132 33 1.3k
Powell L. Graham United States 9 608 1.0× 383 0.7× 109 0.3× 205 1.2× 123 0.9× 11 1.2k
Mieke J. Aarts Netherlands 24 892 1.4× 502 1.0× 164 0.5× 250 1.5× 236 1.8× 77 1.5k
T.J. Wilhite United States 7 872 1.4× 432 0.8× 98 0.3× 211 1.3× 128 1.0× 15 1.3k
Yueming Zhang China 15 459 0.7× 401 0.8× 491 1.5× 440 2.6× 150 1.1× 75 1.6k
Ruth H. Jack United Kingdom 25 937 1.5× 342 0.7× 149 0.4× 210 1.3× 320 2.4× 60 1.6k
Sylke Ruth Zeißig Germany 19 830 1.3× 373 0.7× 98 0.3× 162 1.0× 143 1.1× 75 1.3k
Nina N. Sanford United States 21 474 0.8× 402 0.8× 110 0.3× 253 1.5× 175 1.3× 113 1.2k
Phillip Parente Australia 21 698 1.1× 420 0.8× 118 0.4× 92 0.6× 63 0.5× 82 1.5k
Gianluca Vanni Italy 20 553 0.9× 250 0.5× 109 0.3× 336 2.0× 61 0.5× 104 1.2k
Janice Tsang Hong Kong 20 885 1.4× 222 0.4× 102 0.3× 99 0.6× 72 0.5× 39 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Beenish Nafees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beenish Nafees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beenish Nafees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beenish Nafees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beenish Nafees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beenish Nafees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beenish Nafees. The network helps show where Beenish Nafees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beenish Nafees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beenish Nafees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beenish Nafees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beenish Nafees. Beenish Nafees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nafees, Beenish, et al.. (2025). Innovative approaches to mental health care in Pakistan: perspectives from a nonprofit organization. Mental Health and Social Inclusion. 29(5). 602–607. 1 indexed citations
2.
Nafees, Beenish, et al.. (2023). A Health State Utility Study to Elicit Societal Values Associated with Pulmonary Hypertension. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 17. 2119–2130. 1 indexed citations
3.
Nafees, Beenish, et al.. (2020). PRO131 A Societal Utility Study to Elicit Values for Stages of Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) in the United Kingdom. Value in Health. 23. S713–S713. 3 indexed citations
4.
Hall, Fiona, et al.. (2019). Estimating utilities/disutilities for high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and treatment-related adverse events. Quality of Life Research. 28(5). 1191–1199. 21 indexed citations
5.
6.
Nafees, Beenish, Zenia M. Størling, Charlotte Hindsberger, & Andrew Lloyd. (2018). The ostomy leak impact tool: development and validation of a new patient-reported tool to measure the burden of leakage in ostomy device users. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 16(1). 231–231. 33 indexed citations
7.
8.
Svedsäter, Henrik, David Leather, Terence J. Robinson, et al.. (2017). Evaluation and quantification of treatment preferences for patients with asthma or COPD using discrete choice experiment surveys. Respiratory Medicine. 132. 76–83. 12 indexed citations
9.
Nafees, Beenish, Mikkel Mylius Rasmussen, & Andrew Lloyd. (2017). The Ostomy-Q: Development and Psychometric Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Outcomes Associated with Ostomy Appliances.. PubMed. 63(1). 12–22. 10 indexed citations
10.
Nafees, Beenish, Andrew Lloyd, Anton Emmanuel, & Rachel Ballinger. (2016). Managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction: what do patients prefer? A discrete choice experiment of patient preferences for transanal irrigation and standard bowel management. Patient Preference and Adherence. 10. 195–195. 10 indexed citations
11.
Nafees, Beenish, et al.. (2016). An Assessment of Health-State Utilities in Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United Kingdom. Value in Health. 19(3). A157–A157. 3 indexed citations
12.
Wicks, Paul, et al.. (2016). The real-world patient experience of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate for multiple sclerosis. BMC Research Notes. 9(1). 434–434. 28 indexed citations
13.
Mukuria, Clara, Donna Rowen, John Brazier, Tracey Young, & Beenish Nafees. (2015). Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for Myelofibrosis from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the MF-SAF. Value in Health. 18(6). 846–855. 24 indexed citations
14.
Nafees, Beenish, et al.. (2015). Patient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent self-catheters. Patient Preference and Adherence. 9. 381–381. 20 indexed citations
15.
Nafees, Beenish, Juliana Setyawan, Andrew Lloyd, et al.. (2014). Parent preferences regarding stimulant therapies for ADHD: a comparison across six European countries. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 23(12). 1189–1200. 25 indexed citations
16.
Nafees, Beenish, et al.. (2014). Health State Utilities In Chronic Heart Failure In The Uk. Value in Health. 17(7). A493–A493. 3 indexed citations
17.
Nafees, Beenish, et al.. (2012). Reliability and validity of the Personal and Social Performance scale in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 140(1-3). 71–76. 36 indexed citations
18.
Nafees, Beenish, Anne M. Rentz, D. Revicki, et al.. (2008). National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25-Item Reduction Using Rasch Analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 4462–4462. 1 indexed citations
19.
Lloyd, Adam, et al.. (2008). Health utility values associated with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Medicine. 25(5). 618–624. 68 indexed citations
20.
Lloyd, Andrew, et al.. (2006). Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 95(6). 683–690. 299 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Powell L. Graham Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mieke J. Aarts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T.J. Wilhite Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yueming Zhang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruth H. Jack Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sylke Ruth Zeißig Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nina N. Sanford Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Phillip Parente Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gianluca Vanni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janice Tsang
Rankless by CCL
2026