Amit Khot
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Hematology top 5%
- Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 20
- Oncology 22
- Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis 5
- Viral-associated cancers and disorders 5
- Co-authors
- Michael Dickinson (11 shared papers)H. Miles Prince (11 shared papers)Constantine S. Tam (8 shared papers)Simon J. Harrison (17 shared papers)Kate Burbury (6 shared papers)David Ritchie (10 shared papers)Nadine Hein (7 shared papers)David Westerman (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Blood (12 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (3 papers)Blood Advances (2 papers)Cancers (2 papers)Supportive Care in Cancer (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amit Khot
45 papers receiving 961 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Genetics 253
- Hematology 253
- Dermatology 184
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 340
- Oncology 299
Countries citing papers authored by Amit Khot
This map shows the geographic impact of Amit Khot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amit Khot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amit Khot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amit Khot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amit Khot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amit Khot. The network helps show where Amit Khot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amit Khot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 169 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 153 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 132 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 79 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 7 |
About Amit Khot
Amit Khot is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Hematology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 971 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (20 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (15 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (13 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (8 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (7 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (7 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (5 papers) and Viral-associated cancers and disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (253 citations), Hematology (253 citations), Dermatology (184 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (340 citations) and Oncology (299 citations). Amit Khot has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Dickinson, H. Miles Prince, Constantine S. Tam, Simon J. Harrison, Kate Burbury, David Ritchie, Nadine Hein, David Westerman, Ross D. Hannan and Grant A. McArthur. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood Advances, Cancers and Supportive Care in Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.