Amélia T. Henriques
- Plant Science top 1%
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marcos SobralMiriam Anders ApelRenata Pereira LimbergerGilsane Lino von PoserElfrides Eva Scherman SchapovalPaulo Roberto Hrihorowitsch MorenoChantal MenutLuiz Carlos Klein‐Júnior
- Topics
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (43 papers)Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (34 papers)Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (33 papers)
- Cited by
- PharmacologyBiochemistryFood Science
- Partner nations
- BrazilFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Amélia T. Henriques
128 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Plant Science 1.4k
- Food Science 951
- Molecular Biology 915
- Pharmacology 807
- Organic Chemistry 571
Countries citing papers authored by Amélia T. Henriques
This map shows the geographic impact of Amélia T. Henriques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amélia T. Henriques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amélia T. Henriques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amélia T. Henriques
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amélia T. Henriques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amélia T. Henriques. The network helps show where Amélia T. Henriques may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amélia T. Henriques
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amélia T. Henriques. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amélia T. Henriques based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amélia T. Henriques. Amélia T. Henriques is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 153 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | Morphoanatomical identification and physicochemical parameters of the drug Erythrina verna Vell. trunk bark | 6 |
| 7 | 48 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 76 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | Bases química y farmacológicas de la utilización de la sangre de drago | 1 |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | Cocaine-Like Actions of Erythroxylum argentinum Schulz (Erythroxylaceae) | 1 |
| 20 | 16 |
About Amélia T. Henriques
Amélia T. Henriques is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Food Science, having authored 131 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (43 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (34 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (807 citations), Biochemistry (438 citations) and Food Science (951 citations). Amélia T. Henriques has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marcos Sobral, Miriam Anders Apel, Renata Pereira Limberger, Gilsane Lino von Poser, Elfrides Eva Scherman Schapoval, Paulo Roberto Hrihorowitsch Moreno, Chantal Menut, Luiz Carlos Klein‐Júnior, Eduardo Luis Konrath and Carolina dos Santos Passos. Their work appears in journals such as Bioresource Technology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Analytica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.