Fernando B. Da Costa
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Plant Science top 1%
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Food Science top 1%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Co-authors
- RuAngelie Edrada‐EbelSérgio Ricardo AmbrósioBruno Leite SampaioDaniela Aparecida Chagas‐PaulaRejane Barbosa de OliveiraCarlos R. TirapelliThomas J. SchmidtGuillermo F. Padilla-González
- Topics
- Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (80 papers)Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (47 papers)Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (42 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Fernando B. Da Costa
134 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Molecular Biology 2.1k
- Plant Science 1.5k
- Cancer Research 1.1k
- Food Science 761
- Pharmacology 385
Countries citing papers authored by Fernando B. Da Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando B. Da Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando B. Da Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando B. Da Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando B. Da Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando B. Da Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando B. Da Costa. The network helps show where Fernando B. Da Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fernando B. Da Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fernando B. Da Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fernando B. Da Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fernando B. Da Costa. Fernando B. Da Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 81 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 100 | |
| 18 | 50 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Fernando B. Da Costa
Fernando B. Da Costa is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 138 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (80 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (47 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (42 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.1k citations), Pharmacology (385 citations) and Food Science (761 citations). Fernando B. Da Costa has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include RuAngelie Edrada‐Ebel, Sérgio Ricardo Ambrósio, Bruno Leite Sampaio, Daniela Aparecida Chagas‐Paula, Rejane Barbosa de Oliveira, Carlos R. Tirapelli, Thomas J. Schmidt, Guillermo F. Padilla-González, Ana Maria de Oliveira and Leonardo Gobbo‐Neto. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.