Amber John

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
51 papers, 597 citations indexed

About

Amber John is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber John has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 597 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 23 papers in Clinical Psychology and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amber John's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (22 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (8 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers). Amber John is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (22 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (8 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers). Amber John collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Amber John's co-authors include Joshua Stott, Marcus Richards, Darya Gaysina, Roopal Desai, Jennifer Rusted, Georgina Charlesworth, Rob Saunders, Joshua E. J. Buckman, Natalie L. Marchant and Jiamin Yin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and European Heart Journal.

In The Last Decade

Amber John

41 papers receiving 588 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Bidirectional Associations of Depressive Symptoms and Cognitive Function Over Time

2024 33 citations Amber John et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amber John United Kingdom	13	236	143	128	87	82	51	597
Isabel González‐Abraldes Spain	10	229 1.0×	163 1.1×	83 0.6×	71 0.8×	172 2.1×	13	724
Graham M.L. Eglit United States	15	199 0.8×	72 0.5×	117 0.9×	82 0.9×	55 0.7×	39	581
Robert Sigström Sweden	13	190 0.8×	91 0.6×	137 1.1×	43 0.5×	56 0.7×	40	478
Beverly Roberts United Kingdom	11	144 0.6×	93 0.7×	112 0.9×	67 0.8×	51 0.6×	14	658
José Posada-Villa Colombia	7	283 1.2×	58 0.4×	176 1.4×	120 1.4×	101 1.2×	11	691
Fanny Matharan France	10	246 1.0×	148 1.0×	46 0.4×	85 1.0×	91 1.1×	16	568
Jason E. Schillerstrom United States	15	147 0.6×	95 0.7×	188 1.5×	54 0.6×	113 1.4×	37	610
Anna Sundström Sweden	14	375 1.6×	268 1.9×	115 0.9×	123 1.4×	116 1.4×	27	802
Bernice A. Marcopulos United States	13	338 1.4×	71 0.5×	87 0.7×	152 1.7×	75 0.9×	32	608
Linnea Sjöberg Sweden	13	189 0.8×	219 1.5×	84 0.7×	125 1.4×	103 1.3×	28	741

Countries citing papers authored by Amber John

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber John

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber John. The network helps show where Amber John may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber John

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber John. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber John based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber John. Amber John is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Saunders, Rob, Joshua E. J. Buckman, Dave Dagnan, et al.. (2025). Effectiveness of psychological therapies for depression or anxiety in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective, matched, observational cohort study of primary care electronic healthcare records in England. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1–9. 2 indexed citations

Ghai, Sangeet, Anne Corbett, Clive Ballard, et al.. (2025). The Association Between Autism Spectrum Traits and Age-Related Spatial Working Memory Decline: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study. The Gerontologist. 65(5). 3 indexed citations

Steare, Thomas, Joshua E. J. Buckman, Joshua Stott, et al.. (2024). Bidirectional changes in depressive symptoms and social functioning in older adults attending psychological therapy services. Journal of Affective Disorders. 369. 954–962. 3 indexed citations

Desai, Roopal, et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) for mild to moderate dementia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials using the original CST protocol. Ageing Research Reviews. 97. 102312–102312. 13 indexed citations

Willroth, Emily C, Gabrielle N. Pfund, Patrick L. Hill, et al.. (2024). A review of the literature on wellbeing and modifiable dementia risk factors. Ageing Research Reviews. 99. 102380–102380. 9 indexed citations

Saunders, Rob, Joshua E. J. Buckman, Georgina Charlesworth, et al.. (2024). Predictors of primary care psychological therapy outcomes for depression and anxiety in people living with dementia: evidence from national healthcare records in England. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 224(6). 205–212. 1 indexed citations

Suárez‐González, Aida, Amber John, Emilie Brotherhood, et al.. (2023). "Better Living with Non-memory-led Dementia": protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a web-based caregiver educational programme. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 9(1). 2 indexed citations

Desai, Roopal, Claudia Cooper, Natalie L. Marchant, et al.. (2023). Psychological therapies for depression and cardiovascular risk: evidence from national healthcare records in England. European Heart Journal. 44(18). 1650–1662. 31 indexed citations

Desai, Roopal, Amber John, Rob Saunders, et al.. (2023). Examining the Lancet Commission risk factors for dementia using Mendelian randomisation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 26(1). e300555–e300555. 17 indexed citations

10.

Desai, Roopal, Anastasia Tsipa, Georgina Charlesworth, et al.. (2023). Suicide and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Risk Factors. SSRN Electronic Journal.

11.

Stott, Joshua, Anastasia Tsipa, Georgina Charlesworth, et al.. (2023). Suicide ideation, attempts and deaths in people living with dementia (PLWD): A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence and risk factors. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 19(S22).

12.

Buckman, Joshua E. J., Joshua Stott, Amber John, et al.. (2023). Measurement invariance and differential item functioning of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 between working age and older adults seeking treatment for common mental disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders. 347. 15–22. 4 indexed citations

13.

Saunders, Rob, Joshua E. J. Buckman, Georgina Charlesworth, et al.. (2022). Effectiveness of primary care psychological therapy services for the treatment of depression and anxiety in people living with dementia: Evidence from national healthcare records in England. EClinicalMedicine. 52. 101692–101692. 10 indexed citations

14.

Saunders, Rob, et al.. (2022). Positive psychological constructs and association with reduced risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews. 77. 101594–101594. 21 indexed citations

15.

Desai, Roopal, Rob Saunders, Aida Suárez‐González, et al.. (2021). Neuropsychological deficits in Posterior Cortical Atrophy and typical Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analytic review. Cortex. 143. 223–236. 7 indexed citations

16.

Desai, Roopal, Tim Whitfield, Amber John, et al.. (2021). Affective symptoms and risk of progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia in subjective cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews. 71. 101419–101419. 35 indexed citations

17.

Saunders, Rob, Joshua E. J. Buckman, Joshua Stott, et al.. (2021). Older adults respond better to psychological therapy than working-age adults: evidence from a large sample of mental health service attendees.. Journal of Affective Disorders. 294. 85–93. 44 indexed citations

18.

John, Amber, Jennifer Rusted, Marcus Richards, & Darya Gaysina. (2020). Bidirectional relation between affective symptoms and cognitive function from middle to late adulthood: a population-based birth cohort study. Aging & Mental Health. 25(9). 1642–1648. 5 indexed citations

19.

James, Sarah‐Naomi, Daniel Davis, Nikhil Sharma, et al.. (2018). Lifetime affective problems and later-life cognitive state: Over 50 years of follow-up in a British birth cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 241. 348–355. 22 indexed citations

20.

Shackley, David, Gareth Parry, Laurence P. Clarke, et al.. (2017). Variation in the prevalence of urinary catheters: a profile of National Health Service patients in England. BMJ Open. 7(6). e013842–e013842. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact