Ageing Research Reviews

2.2k papers and 125.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Ageing Research Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 125.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Ageing Research Reviews usually cover Physiology (849 papers), Molecular Biology (758 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (261 papers) specifically the topics of Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (285 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (256 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (188 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ageing Research Reviews are Mark P. Mattson, Antero Salminen, Laure Rittié, Kai Kaarniranta, Dick F. Swaab, Alexander Kalinkovich, Gregory Livshits, Thomas W. Buford, Suresh I. S. Rattan and P. Hemachandra Reddy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ageing Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ageing Research Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ageing Research Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Ageing Research Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ageing Research Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ageing Research Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ageing Research Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025