Amber Howell

410 total citations
8 papers, 176 citations indexed

About

Amber Howell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber Howell has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 176 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 papers in Biological Psychiatry and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amber Howell's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers). Amber Howell is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers). Amber Howell collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Amber Howell's co-authors include J. Daniel Ragland, Tyler A. Lesh, Cameron S. Carter, Tara A. Niendam, Allan L. Reiss, Gary H. Glover, Iliana I. Karipidis, Huan Wang, Costin Tanase and Alan Anticevic and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuropsychopharmacology and Molecular Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Amber Howell

8 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amber Howell United States	6	117	40	39	34	27	8	176
Xiao‐Hui Hou China	5	122 1.0×	45 1.1×	53 1.4×	20 0.6×	21 0.8×	9	196
Kamil Bonna Poland	4	235 2.0×	40 1.0×	19 0.5×	14 0.4×	50 1.9×	4	256
Elizabeth Ankudowich Canada	10	215 1.8×	17 0.4×	67 1.7×	20 0.6×	32 1.2×	12	267
Michael C. Riedel United States	7	124 1.1×	26 0.7×	22 0.6×	14 0.4×	50 1.9×	9	173
Christiana Westlin United States	5	91 0.8×	11 0.3×	39 1.0×	33 1.0×	51 1.9×	10	175
Iris Broce United States	6	123 1.1×	62 1.6×	35 0.9×	10 0.3×	30 1.1×	12	184
Caroline Diehl United States	6	101 0.9×	29 0.7×	40 1.0×	12 0.4×	34 1.3×	16	160
Christina Coventry United States	11	140 1.2×	14 0.3×	127 3.3×	16 0.5×	14 0.5×	18	274
Lawrence Faziola United States	5	50 0.4×	16 0.4×	88 2.3×	11 0.3×	22 0.8×	11	141
Yi Pu China	8	253 2.2×	71 1.8×	38 1.0×	10 0.3×	35 1.3×	13	295

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Howell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Howell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Howell. The network helps show where Amber Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber Howell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber Howell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber Howell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber Howell. Amber Howell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Helmer, Markus, Shaun Warrington, Ali‐Reza Mohammadi‐Nejad, et al.. (2024). On the stability of canonical correlation analysis and partial least squares with application to brain-behavior associations. Communications Biology. 7(1). 217–217. 25 indexed citations

2.

Howell, Amber & Alan Anticevic. (2024). Functional Connectivity Biomarkers in Schizophrenia. Advances in neurobiology. 40. 237–283. 3 indexed citations

3.

Smucny, Jason, Laura M. Tully, Amber Howell, et al.. (2021). Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are associated with opposite brain reward anticipation-associated response. Neuropsychopharmacology. 46(6). 1152–1160. 9 indexed citations

4.

Xie, Hua, Iliana I. Karipidis, Amber Howell, et al.. (2020). Finding the neural correlates of collaboration using a three-person fMRI hyperscanning paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(37). 23066–23072. 41 indexed citations

5.

Lesh, Tyler A., Richard J. Maddock, Amber Howell, et al.. (2019). Extracellular free water and glutathione in first-episode psychosis—a multimodal investigation of an inflammatory model for psychosis. Molecular Psychiatry. 26(3). 761–771. 35 indexed citations

6.

Ray, Kimberly L., Tyler A. Lesh, Amber Howell, et al.. (2017). Functional network changes and cognitive control in schizophrenia. NeuroImage Clinical. 15. 161–170. 39 indexed citations

7.

Howell, Amber, et al.. (2013). Teaching “how?” mand-for-information frames to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 46(4). 781–791. 22 indexed citations

8.

Ogletree, Billy T., et al.. (2005). A Procedure for Socially Valid Goal Setting. Intervention in School and Clinic. 41(2). 76–81. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact