Laura M. Tully
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Christine I. HookerSarah Hope LincolnDavid Dodell‐FederTara A. NiendamAna‐Maria IosifDivya KumarNadia Liyanage-DonSara C. Verosky
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (20 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Laura M. Tully
37 papers receiving 753 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Psychiatry and Mental health 352
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 293
- Cognitive Neuroscience 292
- Clinical Psychology 179
- Applied Psychology 133
Countries citing papers authored by Laura M. Tully
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura M. Tully's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura M. Tully with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura M. Tully more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura M. Tully
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura M. Tully. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura M. Tully. The network helps show where Laura M. Tully may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura M. Tully
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura M. Tully. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura M. Tully based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura M. Tully. Laura M. Tully is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 79 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | EVIDENCE FOR A PSEUDOAUTOSOMAL LOCUS FOR SCHIZOPHRENIA | 1 |
About Laura M. Tully
Laura M. Tully is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 762 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (20 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (133 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (352 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (293 citations). Laura M. Tully has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christine I. Hooker, Sarah Hope Lincoln, David Dodell‐Feder, Tara A. Niendam, Ana‐Maria Iosif, Divya Kumar, Nadia Liyanage-Don, Sara C. Verosky, Melissa Fisher and Sophia Vinogradov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.