Neuropsychopharmacology

7.2k papers and 473.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.2k papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 473.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.8k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k papers) and Molecular Biology (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2.5k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.9k papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuropsychopharmacology are George F. Koob, Nora D. Volkow, G F Koob, Ronald S. Duman, Florian Holsboer, Trevor W. Robbins, Suzanne N. Haber, Brian Knutson, BS McEwen and Frank P. Bymaster.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology.

Countries where authors publish in Neuropsychopharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuropsychopharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuropsychopharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuropsychopharmacology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025