Amber D. Lambert
- Education top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Pu‐Shih Daniel ChenKevin R. GuidryAngie L. MillerAndrew Howard NicholsSamuel D. MuseusKristie L. Speirs NeumeisterLisa R. LattucaPatrick T. Terenzini
- Topics
- Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers)Higher Education Research Studies (4 papers)Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaComputers & EducationResearch in Higher Education
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amber D. Lambert
10 papers receiving 780 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Education 570
- Sociology and Political Science 214
- Social Psychology 160
- Computer Science Applications 143
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 127
Countries citing papers authored by Amber D. Lambert
This map shows the geographic impact of Amber D. Lambert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber D. Lambert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber D. Lambert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amber D. Lambert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber D. Lambert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber D. Lambert. The network helps show where Amber D. Lambert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber D. Lambert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber D. Lambert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber D. Lambert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber D. Lambert. Amber D. Lambert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lower Response Rates on Alumni Surveys Might Not Mean Lower Response Representativeness. | 35 |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | Comparing Skills and Competencies for High School, Undergraduate, and Graduate Arts Alumni. | 10 |
| 5 | 89 | |
| 6 | Using Cognitive Interviews to Improve Survey Instruments | 30 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagementbreakdown → | 514 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 123 | |
| 11 | 32 |
About Amber D. Lambert
Amber D. Lambert is a scholar working on Architecture, Education and Media Technology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 889 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (4 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (143 citations), Education (570 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (127 citations). Amber D. Lambert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Pu‐Shih Daniel Chen, Kevin R. Guidry, Angie L. Miller, Andrew Howard Nichols, Samuel D. Museus, Kristie L. Speirs Neumeister, Lisa R. Lattuca, Patrick T. Terenzini, Heather Haeger and Shimon Sarraf. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers & Education and Research in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.