Amanda Lazar
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.2%
- Demography top 0.2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anne Marie PiperAlisha PradhanHilaire J. ThompsonGeorge DemirisLeah FindlaterDavid H. NguyenChristian KoehlerTheresa Jean Tanenbaum
- Topics
- Technology Use by Older Adults (48 papers)Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (40 papers)AI in Service Interactions (11 papers)
- Journals
- Communications of the ACMAmerican Journal of Preventive MedicineJournal of Medical Internet Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amanda Lazar
79 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Human-Computer Interaction 1.0k
- Demography 968
- Artificial Intelligence 522
- Social Psychology 435
- General Health Professions 421
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Lazar
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Lazar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Lazar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Lazar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Lazar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Lazar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Lazar. The network helps show where Amanda Lazar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Lazar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Lazar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Lazar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Lazar. Amanda Lazar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | Why we use and abandon smart devicesbreakdown → | 290 |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 147 | |
| 20 | 120 |
About Amanda Lazar
Amanda Lazar is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Demography, having authored 84 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (48 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (40 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (1.0k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (164 citations) and Demography (968 citations). Amanda Lazar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anne Marie Piper, Alisha Pradhan, Hilaire J. Thompson, George Demiris, Leah Findlater, David H. Nguyen, Christian Koehler, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Emma Dixon and Gazihan Alankuş. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.