Emma Dixon
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Demography top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Amanda LazarKapil Chalil MadathilHeidi M. ZinzowAmro KhasawnehPamela WiśniewskiAnne Marie PiperRebecca RothShraddhaa Narasimha
- Topics
- Technology Use by Older Adults (12 papers)Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers)
- Journals
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteThe Journal of UrologyJournal of Medical Internet Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emma Dixon
28 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Human-Computer Interaction 96
- Demography 93
- Applied Psychology 67
- General Health Professions 66
- Sociology and Political Science 57
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Dixon. The network helps show where Emma Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Dixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Dixon. Emma Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | Safe Enough to Share: Setting the Dementia Agenda Online. | 10 |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Emma Dixon
Emma Dixon is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Health Informatics and Demography, having authored 28 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (12 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (96 citations), Applied Psychology (67 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations). Emma Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Amanda Lazar, Kapil Chalil Madathil, Heidi M. Zinzow, Amro Khasawneh, Pamela Wiśniewski, Anne Marie Piper, Rebecca Roth, Shraddhaa Narasimha, Jeffrey W. Bertrand and Alisha Pradhan. Their work appears in journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, The Journal of Urology and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.