Amanda Eustace
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Otorhinolaryngology top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 7
- Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research 2
- Co-authors
- Catharine West (7 shared papers)Lucy J.C. Smyth (2 shared papers)Dave Singh (2 shared papers)Helen Denley (4 shared papers)Peter Hoskin (4 shared papers)Joely J. Irlam (5 shared papers)Adrian L. Harris (4 shared papers)Takeshi Nishioka (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Cancer Research (2 papers)CHEST Journal (2 papers)Radiotherapy and Oncology (1 paper)Cell Structure and Function (1 paper)Oncotarget (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Amanda Eustace
11 papers receiving 705 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Cancer Research 317
- Otorhinolaryngology 29
- Emergency Medical Services 47
- Immunology 132
- Biophysics 35
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Eustace
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Eustace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Eustace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Eustace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Eustace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Eustace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Eustace. The network helps show where Amanda Eustace may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Eustace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 167 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 102 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 95 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 73 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 62 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 11 | Reduction of tumor cell chemoresistance through HIF-1 inhibition | 2006 | 2 |
About Amanda Eustace
Amanda Eustace is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Biophysics, Emergency Medical Services, Biochemistry and Hepatology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (7 papers), IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (2 papers) and Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (317 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (29 citations), Emergency Medical Services (47 citations), Immunology (132 citations) and Biophysics (35 citations). Amanda Eustace has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Catharine West, Lucy J.C. Smyth, Dave Singh, Helen Denley, Peter Hoskin, Joely J. Irlam, Adrian L. Harris, Takeshi Nishioka, Janet Taylor and Francesca M. Buffa. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, CHEST Journal, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Cell Structure and Function and Oncotarget.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.