David Ryder

35 papers receiving 938 citations

Peers

David Ryder
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 131
  • Oncology 300
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 169
  • Otorhinolaryngology 34
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 202
Replace Megan E. Miller with:
Megan E. Miller United States
Pat Fobair United States
Lindsay Fraser United Kingdom
Michael A. Richards United Kingdom
Diarmuid Coughlan United Kingdom
Robert P. Derhagopian United States
Linda Sutton United States
Judith Hurley United States
Karen Poole United Kingdom
Kelly K. Dineen United States
David Ryder relative to Megan E. Miller United States Megan E. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Megan E. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ryder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ryder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ryder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ryder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ryder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ryder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ryder. The network helps show where David Ryder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ryder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ryder Line = papers co-authored together David Ryder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012184
2 2004174
3 2019154
4 200595
5 201148
6 201344
7 200843
8 201641
9 201436
10 201829
11 201815
12 198814
13
Drug use and drug-related harm: a delicate balance.
200112
14 198812
15 198612
16 202211
17 199610
18 20089
19 20209
20 20178

About David Ryder

David Ryder is a scholar working on General Psychology, Otorhinolaryngology, Applied Psychology, Epidemiology and Social Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (10 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (131 citations), Oncology (300 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (169 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (34 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (202 citations). David Ryder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Mackereth, Alex Molassiotis, Emma Ream, Jennifer Finnegan-John, Jacqueline Filshie, Alison Richardson, Myra F. Taylor, Sherry Saggers, Richard Fordham and Tim Stockwell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Addiction, Drug and Alcohol Review, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026