PLoS Biology

6.0k papers and 491.6k indexed citations

About

The 6.0k papers published in PLoS Biology in the last decades have received a total of 491.6k indexed citations. Papers published in PLoS Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (2.7k papers), Genetics (927 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (779 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (424 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (276 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (249 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PLoS Biology are Simon Y. W. Ho, Andrew Rambaut, Alexei J. Drummond, Matthew J. Phillips, Innes C. Cuthill, Douglas G. Altman, Carol Kilkenny, Michael Emerson, William J. Browne and Shai Fuchs.

In The Last Decade

PLoS Biology

5.7k papers receiving 482.7k citations

Fields of papers published in PLoS Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in PLoS Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PLoS Biology.

Countries where authors publish in PLoS Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PLoS Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PLoS Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PLoS Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026