Harm Veling

84 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Harm Veling
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Applied Psychology 1.2k
  • General Decision Sciences 113
  • Clinical Psychology 1.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 783
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 387
Replace Guido M. van Koningsbruggen with:
Guido M. van Koningsbruggen Netherlands
Esther K. Papies Netherlands
Natalie J. Loxton Australia
Dylan D. Wagner United States
Carolien Martijn Netherlands
Cendri A. Hutcherson Canada
Laura Nynke van der Laan Netherlands
Adriaan Spruyt Belgium
Barry T. Jones United Kingdom
Damien Brevers Belgium
Harm Veling relative to Guido M. van Koningsbruggen Netherlands Guido M. van Koningsbruggen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Guido M. van Koningsbruggen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Harm Veling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harm Veling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harm Veling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harm Veling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Harm Veling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harm Veling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harm Veling. The network helps show where Harm Veling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Harm Veling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Harm Veling Line = papers co-authored together Harm Veling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014140
2 2008136
3 2011128
4 2012124
5 2017102
6 2016101
7 201687
8 201387
9 201787
10 201384
11 201276
12 202057
13 201651
14 201746
15 201745
16 201740
17 201040
18 201939
19 201039
20 201837

About Harm Veling

Harm Veling is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (45 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (32 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (19 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (16 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Media Influence and Health (6 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.2k citations), General Decision Sciences (113 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (783 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (387 citations). Harm Veling has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Henk Aarts, Rob W. Holland, Wolfgang Stroebe, Zhang Chen, Guido M. van Koningsbruggen, Esther K. Papies, Ap Dijksterhuis, Ad van Knippenberg, Natalia Lawrence and Moniek Buijzen. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Cognition & Emotion, Judgment and Decision Making, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026