Harm Veling

3.7k total citations
90 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Harm Veling is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Harm Veling has authored 90 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 45 papers in Applied Psychology and 22 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Harm Veling's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (45 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (32 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (19 papers). Harm Veling is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (45 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (32 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (19 papers). Harm Veling collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Harm Veling's co-authors include Henk Aarts, Rob W. Holland, Wolfgang Stroebe, Zhang Chen, Guido M. van Koningsbruggen, Esther K. Papies, Ap Dijksterhuis, Ad van Knippenberg, Natalia Lawrence and Moniek Buijzen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Harm Veling

84 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Harm Veling Netherlands 28 1.2k 1.0k 783 697 406 90 2.4k
Esther K. Papies Netherlands 34 1.5k 1.3× 1.6k 1.6× 449 0.6× 870 1.2× 425 1.0× 92 3.5k
Guido M. van Koningsbruggen Netherlands 21 899 0.8× 726 0.7× 287 0.4× 413 0.6× 671 1.7× 42 1.9k
Natalie J. Loxton Australia 29 829 0.7× 2.1k 2.0× 356 0.5× 476 0.7× 406 1.0× 75 3.2k
Dylan D. Wagner United States 21 631 0.5× 1.0k 1.0× 1.1k 1.4× 146 0.2× 321 0.8× 43 2.8k
Carolien Martijn Netherlands 26 626 0.5× 1.4k 1.4× 208 0.3× 331 0.5× 377 0.9× 59 2.5k
Werner G. K. Stritzke Australia 27 444 0.4× 832 0.8× 305 0.4× 193 0.3× 565 1.4× 56 2.2k
Cendri A. Hutcherson Canada 23 512 0.4× 731 0.7× 1.4k 1.7× 90 0.1× 447 1.1× 41 2.9k
Laura Nynke van der Laan Netherlands 25 252 0.2× 573 0.6× 366 0.5× 494 0.7× 120 0.3× 49 1.9k
Eric Stice United States 19 441 0.4× 2.9k 2.8× 253 0.3× 1.0k 1.5× 275 0.7× 28 3.5k
Erik Z. Woody Canada 34 252 0.2× 1.8k 1.7× 1.6k 2.1× 363 0.5× 398 1.0× 92 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Harm Veling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harm Veling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harm Veling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harm Veling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Harm Veling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harm Veling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harm Veling. The network helps show where Harm Veling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harm Veling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harm Veling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harm Veling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Harm Veling. Harm Veling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Liu, Huaiyu, Lei Zhang, X. L. Kang, et al.. (2025). Shaping food choices with actions and inactions with and without reward and punishment. Appetite. 208. 107950–107950.
2.
Figner, Bernd, et al.. (2025). Disentangling the multifaceted nature of certainty in evaluations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 155(2). 464–478.
3.
Bijlstra, Gijsbert, et al.. (2025). On rewarded actions and punishment-avoidant inactions: The action–valence asymmetry in face perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 119. 104754–104754.
4.
Simons, Monique, et al.. (2024). Creating a healthy and sustainable food environment to promote plant-based food consumption: clear barriers and a gradual transition. BMC Public Health. 24(1). 1607–1607. 2 indexed citations
5.
Wiers, Reínout W., et al.. (2023). Does selective inhibition training reduce relapse rates when added to standard treatment of alcohol use disorder? A randomized controlled trial. Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research. 47(5). 963–974. 8 indexed citations
6.
Liu, Huaiyu, et al.. (2022). Devaluation of NoGo stimuli is both robust and fragile. Cognition & Emotion. 36(5). 876–893. 7 indexed citations
7.
Stekelenburg, Aart van, Gabi Schaap, Harm Veling, & Moniek Buijzen. (2021). Boosting Understanding and Identification of Scientific Consensus Can Help to Correct False Beliefs. Psychological Science. 32(10). 1549–1565. 17 indexed citations
8.
Beckers, Debby G. J., et al.. (2021). Sedentary work and participation in leisure–time physical activity. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 95(2). 509–525. 5 indexed citations
9.
Stekelenburg, Aart van, Gabi Schaap, Harm Veling, & Moniek Buijzen. (2020). Correcting Misperceptions: The Causal Role of Motivation in Corrective Science Communication About Vaccine and Food Safety. Science Communication. 42(1). 31–60. 23 indexed citations
10.
Holland, Rob W., et al.. (2020). Training choices toward low value options. Judgment and Decision Making. 15(2). 254–265. 2 indexed citations
11.
Veling, Harm, et al.. (2020). Availability of synchronous information in an additional sensory modality does not enhance the full body illusion. Psychological Research. 85(6). 2291–2312. 4 indexed citations
12.
Stekelenburg, Aart van, Gabi Schaap, Harm Veling, & Moniek Buijzen. (2020). Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens’ Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(1). e24069–e24069. 27 indexed citations
13.
Beckers, Debby G. J., et al.. (2020). The Impact of Cognitive Fatigue on Motivation to Exert Physical Effort. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 42.
14.
Johannes, Niklas, Adrian Meier, Leonard Reinecke, et al.. (2020). The relationship between online vigilance and affective well-being in everyday life: Combining smartphone logging with experience sampling. Media Psychology. 24(5). 581–605. 57 indexed citations
15.
Scholten, Hanneke, Isabela Granic, Zhang Chen, Harm Veling, & Maartje Luijten. (2019). Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?. Psychology and Health. 34(5). 609–625. 16 indexed citations
16.
Johannes, Niklas, Harm Veling, Thijs Verwijmeren, & Moniek Buijzen. (2018). Hard to Resist?. Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications. 31(4). 214–225. 37 indexed citations
17.
Veling, Harm, et al.. (2018). Training Choices Toward Low Value Options. Judgment and Decision Making. 15(2). 254–265. 1 indexed citations
18.
Holland, Rob W., et al.. (2018). How Preference Change Induced by Mere Action Versus Inaction Persists Over Time. Judgment and Decision Making. 16(1). 201–237. 1 indexed citations
19.
Veling, Harm, Natalia Lawrence, Zhang Chen, Guido M. van Koningsbruggen, & Rob W. Holland. (2017). What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda. Current Addiction Reports. 4(1). 35–41. 102 indexed citations
20.
Zedelius, Claire M., Harm Veling, & Henk Aarts. (2012). When unconscious rewards boost cognitive task performance inefficiently: the role of consciousness in integrating value and attainability information. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 6. 219–219. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026