Robert Lewis
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 0.5%
- Media Influence and Health
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Media Influence and Health 17
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 4
- Co-authors
- Ron TamboriniMatthew GrizzardAllison EdenNicholas David BowmanRené WeberLeonard ReineckeSujay PrabhuD. Thorburn Burns
- Journals
- Analytica Chimica Acta (6 papers)Journal of Communication (4 papers)Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (4 papers)Communication Research Reports (3 papers)Mass Communication & Society (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Robert Lewis
89 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Literature and Literary Theory 432
- Applied Psychology 80
- Gender Studies 147
- Communication 102
- Social Psychology 267
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Lewis. The network helps show where Robert Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 6 | Sharing professional knowledge: organizational memory | 2014 | 1 |
| 7 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 76 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 11 | A Content Analysis of Moral Foundations Presented in Spanish and English Language Soap Operas | 2011 | 4 |
| 12 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 40 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 25 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 112 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 20 | TRIP GENERATION TECHNIQUES | 1970 | 6 |
About Robert Lewis
Robert Lewis is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Applied Psychology, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 93 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (17 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (432 citations), Applied Psychology (80 citations), Gender Studies (147 citations), Communication (102 citations) and Social Psychology (267 citations). Robert Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ron Tamborini, Matthew Grizzard, Allison Eden, Nicholas David Bowman, René Weber, Leonard Reinecke, Sujay Prabhu, D. Thorburn Burns, John E. Edwards and Mahmoud A. Ghannoum. Their work appears in journals such as Analytica Chimica Acta, Journal of Communication, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Communication Research Reports and Mass Communication & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.