Linda Squiers
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Health top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ludmila Cofta‐WoerpelCecilia FabrizioLaura LinnanMatthew W. KreuterDiane WeinerSuzanne BakkenMaría E. FernándezDeborah J. Bowen
- Topics
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (19 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers)COVID-19 epidemiological studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Linda Squiers
63 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
- General Health Professions 1.9k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 878
- Clinical Psychology 672
- Health 600
- Sociology and Political Science 533
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Squiers
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Squiers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Squiers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Squiers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Squiers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Squiers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Squiers. The network helps show where Linda Squiers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Squiers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Squiers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Squiers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Squiers. Linda Squiers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Predictors of willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S (vol 21, 338, 2021) | 3 |
| 5 | 144 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | The Health Literacy Skills Conceptual Framework | 1 |
| 16 | 75 | |
| 17 | How We Design Feasibility Studiesbreakdown → | 2378 |
| 18 | 130 | |
| 19 | 247 | |
| 20 | 112 |
About Linda Squiers
Linda Squiers is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Health and Applied Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (19 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.9k citations), Health (600 citations) and Applied Psychology (289 citations). Linda Squiers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Ludmila Cofta‐Woerpel, Cecilia Fabrizio, Laura Linnan, Matthew W. Kreuter, Diane Weiner, Suzanne Bakken, María E. Fernández, Deborah J. Bowen, Bonnie Spring and Lauren McCormack. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Social Science & Medicine and Frontiers in Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.