Anna Kearney

741 total citations
25 papers, 378 citations indexed

About

Anna Kearney is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Kearney has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 378 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10 papers in Genetics and 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Anna Kearney's work include Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (10 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (10 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers). Anna Kearney is often cited by papers focused on Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (10 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (10 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers). Anna Kearney collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Anna Kearney's co-authors include Carrol Gamble, Mike Clarke, Paula Williamson, Jane Blazeby, J. Athene Lane, Anne Daykin, Alison Shaw, Shaun Treweek, Valerie Brueton and Jemma Hudson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Anna Kearney

23 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Kearney United Kingdom 11 141 120 85 68 60 25 378
Adwoa Parker United Kingdom 7 139 1.0× 242 2.0× 69 0.8× 26 0.4× 8 0.1× 8 426
Arabella Clarke United Kingdom 7 54 0.4× 58 0.5× 39 0.5× 10 0.1× 98 1.6× 7 276
Sabrina Cavallo Canada 11 88 0.6× 82 0.7× 47 0.6× 16 0.2× 9 0.1× 20 317
Anouk M. Knops Netherlands 7 117 0.8× 243 2.0× 36 0.4× 22 0.3× 9 0.1× 10 364
Jason Gerson United States 6 75 0.5× 151 1.3× 39 0.5× 10 0.1× 11 0.2× 8 294
Beverlee Warren United States 5 63 0.4× 58 0.5× 33 0.4× 31 0.5× 6 0.1× 11 252
Louisa H. Smith United States 11 104 0.7× 39 0.3× 23 0.3× 7 0.1× 18 0.3× 34 447
Caroline Struthers United Kingdom 5 47 0.3× 150 1.3× 26 0.3× 24 0.4× 5 0.1× 7 284
Grace H. Yoon United States 9 105 0.7× 94 0.8× 23 0.3× 5 0.1× 12 0.2× 22 326
Melissa L. Constantine United States 11 188 1.3× 146 1.2× 44 0.5× 6 0.1× 11 0.2× 23 503

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Kearney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kearney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kearney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kearney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Kearney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kearney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kearney. The network helps show where Anna Kearney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Kearney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Kearney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Kearney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Kearney. Anna Kearney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Kearney, Anna, Paula Williamson, & Susanna Dodd. (2024). A review of core outcome sets (COS) developed for different settings finds there is a subset of outcomes relevant for both research and routine care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 173. 111440–111440. 2 indexed citations
3.
Hotton, Matthew, et al.. (2024). The Craniofacial Collaboration UK: Developmental Outcomes in 7- and 10-Year-Old Children With Sagittal Synostosis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 35(6). 1707–1714. 1 indexed citations
4.
Woolfall, Kerry, Anna Kearney, Lucy Frith, et al.. (2023). Guidance to inform research recruitment processes for studies involving critically ill patients. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 25(1). 95–101. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Kearney, Anna, et al.. (2023). A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 158. 34–43. 10 indexed citations
7.
Dalton, Louise, et al.. (2023). The Craniofacial Collaboration UK: Developmental Outcomes in 7- and 10-Year-Old Children With Metopic Synostosis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 35(1). 96–103. 2 indexed citations
8.
Kearney, Anna, Anna Rosala‐Hallas, Naomi Rainford, et al.. (2022). Increased transparency was required when reporting imputation of primary outcome data in clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 146. 60–67.
9.
Woolfall, Kerry, Anna Kearney, Natalie Pattison, et al.. (2022). Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 12(11). e066149–e066149. 3 indexed citations
10.
Dalton, Louise, et al.. (2022). The Craniofacial Collaboration UK: Developmental Outcomes in 5-Year-Old Children With Metopic Synostosis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 34(3). 855–859. 8 indexed citations
11.
Stock, Nicola Marie, et al.. (2021). Psychological and Physical Health Outcomes in Adults With Craniosynostosis. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 60(3). 257–267. 11 indexed citations
12.
Kearney, Anna, William J Cragg, Declan Devane, et al.. (2021). Developing an online, searchable database to systematically map and organise current literature on retention research (ORRCA2). Clinical Trials. 19(1). 71–80. 5 indexed citations
13.
Gillies, Katie, Anna Kearney, Ciara Keenan, et al.. (2021). Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021(4). 89 indexed citations
14.
Cunliffe, Alexandra, et al.. (2020). Craniofacial Collaboration UK: Developmental Outcomes in 5-Year-Old Children With Sagittal Synostosis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 32(1). 51–54. 10 indexed citations
15.
Daykin, Anne, Clare Clement, Carrol Gamble, et al.. (2018). ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials. Trials. 19(1). 76–76. 43 indexed citations
16.
Kearney, Anna, Anne Daykin, Alison Shaw, et al.. (2018). Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets. PLoS ONE. 13(10). e0204886–e0204886. 33 indexed citations
17.
Kearney, Anna, Siân Thomas, Martin Evans, et al.. (2018). Introduction to the Craniofacial Collaboration UK: A Developmental Screening Protocol at the United Kingdom's Four Highly Specialized Craniofacial Centers. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 30(1). 83–86. 8 indexed citations
18.
Kearney, Anna, Anne Daykin, Alison Shaw, et al.. (2017). Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials. Trials. 18(1). 406–406. 54 indexed citations
19.
Kearney, Anna, Andrew McKay, Helen Hickey, et al.. (2014). Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays. BMJ Open. 4(9). e005874–e005874. 17 indexed citations
20.
Williamson, Paula, Carrol Gamble, Anna Kearney, & Helen Hickey. (2013). Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays. Trials. 14(S1). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adwoa Parker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Arabella Clarke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sabrina Cavallo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anouk M. Knops Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jason Gerson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Beverlee Warren Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Louisa H. Smith Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Caroline Struthers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Grace H. Yoon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melissa L. Constantine
Rankless by CCL
2026