Alison Park

30 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers

Alison Park
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Automotive Engineering 100
  • Sociology and Political Science 321
  • Gender Studies 68
  • Political Science and International Relations 168
  • Genetics 63
Replace Amy Smith with:
Amy Smith United States
Florian Pichler Austria
Alexandru Cernat United Kingdom
Terry Thomas United Kingdom
Sally Baldwin United States
Ramesh Mishra India
Janice McLaughlin United Kingdom
Richard Maisel United States
Susan Dodds Australia
Susan Wright Australia
Alison Park relative to Amy Smith United States Amy Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.2×
Amy Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Park

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Park

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Park. The network helps show where Alison Park may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison Park, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison Park Line = papers co-authored together Alison Park links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20201
3 20200
4 201916
5 20182
6
The effect of higher education on graduates’ attitudes : secondary analysis of the British Social Attitudes Survey
20155
7 201250
8 200724
9 2006108
10
Social-science research and the general social surveys
20059
11
British social attitudes : the 22nd report : two terms of new labour: the public's reaction
20055
12 200445
13 200413
14
Family affairs: cohabitation, marriage and the law
20021
15 200023
16 199940
17
Families and Kinship
199814
18 19950
19 19951
20 19950

About Alison Park

Alison Park is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Gender Studies, History, Political Science and International Relations and Automotive Engineering, having authored 37 papers that have together received 936 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (2 papers), Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (1 paper), Maternal and fetal healthcare (1 paper), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (1 paper), Education Systems and Policy (1 paper) and Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (100 citations), Sociology and Political Science (321 citations), Gender Studies (68 citations), Political Science and International Relations (168 citations) and Genetics (63 citations). Alison Park has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John Curtice, Katarina Thomson, Miranda Phillips, Elizabeth Clery, Omar Mireles, Paul Gradl, Ryan Wilkerson, Catherine Bromley, Lynne I. Wagner and Qilong Yi. Their work appears in journals such as Protein Science, British Journal of Political Science, Acta Astronautica, Acta Neurochirurgica and Sociological Research Online.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026