Tom Smith

1.7k citations
36 papers · 1.0k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 14

Tom Smith

28 papers receiving 912 citations

Hit Papers

General Social Surveys: 1972 - 1994; cumulative codebook5801994202620042015100200300400500

Peers

Tom Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Health 215
  • Gender Studies 165
  • Sociology and Political Science 626
  • Political Science and International Relations 224
  • Communication 59
Replace Tom W. Smith with:
Tom W. Smith United States
Robert W. Oldendick United States
James S. Frideres Canada
Rudy Fenwick United States
Jochem Tolsma Netherlands
Giulia Maria Dotti Sani Italy
Jack McDevitt United States
Merlin Schaeffer Germany
Trenton D. Mize United States
Robert C. Hauhart United States
Tom Smith relative to Tom W. Smith United States Tom W. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Tom W. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Smith. The network helps show where Tom Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Tom Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Smith Line = papers co-authored together Tom Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Scary Monsters And Super Creeps
20171
2 20160
3 20161
4 201422
5
The persistent presidential dummy; differences turn out to be insignificant
20074
6 200625
7
Social-science research and the general social surveys
20059
8 20021
9 20010
10 19991
11 19981
12
General Social Surveys: 1972 - 1994; cumulative codebookbreakdown →
1994580
13 19891
14 198715
15 198517
16 198556
17 198320
18 198215
19 198050
20 198040

About Tom Smith

Tom Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Health and Communication, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (10 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (2 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (2 papers) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (215 citations), Gender Studies (165 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (626 citations). Tom Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include James A. Davis, Jibum Kim, Achim Koch, Alison Park, Robert Y. Shapiro, Jeong‐han Kang, Celia Whitchurch, Jing Shi, R. W. Pearson and Robert E. Whaley. Their work appears in journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly, a/b Auto/Biography Studies, Social Problems, Journal of Religion and Health and Contemporary Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026