Alisha Stein
About
In The Last Decade
Alisha Stein
6 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Marketing 393
- Sociology and Political Science 274
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 253
- Information Systems and Management 70
- Social Psychology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Alisha Stein
This map shows the geographic impact of Alisha Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alisha Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alisha Stein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alisha Stein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alisha Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alisha Stein. The network helps show where Alisha Stein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alisha Stein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alisha Stein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alisha Stein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alisha Stein. Alisha Stein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 163 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 207 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.