Citations per year, relative to Alfred Bork Alfred Bork (= 1×)
peers
Dean Zollman
Countries citing papers authored by Alfred Bork
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alfred Bork's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alfred Bork with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alfred Bork more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alfred Bork. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alfred Bork. The network helps show where Alfred Bork may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alfred Bork
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alfred Bork.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alfred Bork based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alfred Bork. Alfred Bork is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bork, Alfred. (1977). Computers and the Future of Learning.. The journal of college science teaching. 7(2). 88–90.1 indexed citations
19.
Bork, Alfred, et al.. (1972). Physics Computer Development Project.. The journal of college science teaching.1 indexed citations
20.
Bork, Alfred. (1971). Introduction to Computer Programming Languages.. The journal of college science teaching.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.