Alexander Landry
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Jonathan W. SchoolerElliott IhmJonathan N. CloughesyAlissa J. MrazekMichael D. MrazekJennie PonsfordGlynda KinsellaDouglas Murtagh
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Alexander Landry
15 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Clinical Psychology 117
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 108
- Sociology and Political Science 104
- Social Psychology 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 77
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Landry
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Landry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Landry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Landry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Landry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Landry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Landry. The network helps show where Alexander Landry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Landry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Landry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Landry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Landry. Alexander Landry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 115 | |
| 16 | 104 |
About Alexander Landry
Alexander Landry is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (46 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (108 citations) and Clinical Psychology (117 citations). Alexander Landry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan W. Schooler, Elliott Ihm, Jonathan N. Cloughesy, Alissa J. Mrazek, Michael D. Mrazek, Jennie Ponsford, Glynda Kinsella, Douglas Murtagh, Mary A. Hammond and Robb Willer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.