Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Food by-products and food wastes: are they safe enough for their valorization?
2021183 citationsGerardo Álvarez‐Rivera, Alberto Valdés et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Alberto Valdés
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alberto Valdés's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alberto Valdés with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alberto Valdés more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alberto Valdés. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alberto Valdés. The network helps show where Alberto Valdés may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alberto Valdés
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alberto Valdés.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alberto Valdés based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alberto Valdés. Alberto Valdés is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ojeda‐Barrios, Dámaris Leopoldina, et al.. (2010). SWOT analysis and perspectives of pecan production in Chihuahua-Mexico.. 14(27). 348–359.2 indexed citations
12.
Foster, William & Alberto Valdés. (2006). CHILEAN AGRICULTURE AND MAJOR ECONOMIC REFORMS: GROWTH, TRADE, POVERTY AND THE ENVIRONMENT. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 23. 187–214.10 indexed citations
13.
Ferranti, David de, Guillermo Perry, William Foster, Daniel Lederman, & Alberto Valdés. (2005). Beyond the City: The Rural Contribution to Development. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University).69 indexed citations
14.
Valdés, Alberto. (2000). Trade liberalization versus food security? Observations on Latin America.. 39(4). 379–393.1 indexed citations
15.
Valdés, Alberto. (1999). Pobreza y distribución del ingreso en una economía de alto crecimiento: Chile, 1987-1995. Estudios Públicos. 5–47.11 indexed citations
16.
Schiff, Maurice & Alberto Valdés. (1990). Sobre la relación entre pobreza y desnutrición : un enfoque conceptual a nivel del hogar. Latin american journal of economics. 27(81). 139–150.1 indexed citations
17.
Schiff, Maurice & Alberto Valdés. (1990). The Link between Poverty and Malnutrition: A Household Theoretic Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1.9 indexed citations
18.
Valdés, Alberto & Thomas C. Pinckney. (1989). Trade and Macroeconomic Policies' Impact on Agricultural Growth: Evidence to-Date. 5(1). 42–61.3 indexed citations
19.
Valdés, Alberto, et al.. (1979). Economics and the design of small-farmer technology.32 indexed citations
20.
Valdés, Alberto, et al.. (1977). Modelo de simulación por computador para fincas ganaderas. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.