This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Soble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Soble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Soble more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Soble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Soble. The network helps show where Alan Soble may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alan Soble
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alan Soble.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alan Soble based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alan Soble. Alan Soble is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Soble, Alan. (2010). Concerning Self-Love: Analytic Problems in Frankfurt's Account of Love. CommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon).1 indexed citations
Soble, Alan. (2003). Keller on Gender, Science, and McClintock: A Feeling for the Orgasm. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Soble, Alan. (2003). Review of “Fact and Value: Essays on Ethics and Metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson”. CommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon). 4(1). 5.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.