Nicholas J. Ford

745 citations
24 papers · 521 indexed · h-index 13

Nicholas J. Ford

23 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

Nicholas J. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Gender Studies 110
  • General Health Professions 201
  • Social Psychology 152
  • Sociology and Political Science 218
  • Health 42
Replace Rachelle Chadwick with:
Rachelle Chadwick South Africa
Eleanor Formby United Kingdom
Paul Simpson United Kingdom
Regina Facchini Brazil
Louis F. Graham United States
Ingrid Lynch South Africa
Robert Rеynolds Australia
Helga Kristín Hallgrímsdóttir Canada
Tara Lyons Canada
Shannon K. Carter United States
Nicholas J. Ford relative to Rachelle Chadwick South Africa Rachelle Chadwick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Rachelle Chadwick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas J. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas J. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas J. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas J. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas J. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas J. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas J. Ford. The network helps show where Nicholas J. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas J. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas J. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas J. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201424
2 201315
3 20129
4 20062
5
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PERILAKU SEKSUAL REMAJA DI JAWA TENGAH: IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN DAN LAYANAN KESEHATAN SEKSUAL DAN REPRODUKSI
200653
6 200599
7
Surfing and Social Theory: Experience, Embodiment and Narrative of the Dream Glide
200571
8 200411
9 200321
10 20030
11
Structuring the pre-search reference interview: a useful technique for handling clinical questions.
200037
12
Changes in the sexual lifestyles of young people in Somerset, 1990-1996.
199914
13 19997
14 19992
15 19986
16 199631
17 19964
18 199615
19 199616
20 199446

About Nicholas J. Ford

Nicholas J. Ford is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Gender Studies and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 24 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (12 papers), Sex work and related issues (6 papers), Male Reproductive Health Studies (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (2 papers), Women's cancer prevention and management (2 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (110 citations), General Health Professions (201 citations) and Social Psychology (152 citations). Nicholas J. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include David Brown, Elisabeth Meloni Vieira, David Brown, Zahroh Shaluhiyah, Antono Suryoputro, Lester Coleman, Manoel Antônio dos Santos, Andrew Booth, Alan O’Rourke and Wilza Vieira Villela. Their work appears in journals such as Cadernos de Saúde Pública, AIDS Care, Culture Health & Sexuality, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva and Health Education Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026