Alan Heimert
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Mormonism, Religion, and History
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Religious studies top 10%
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 7
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 1
- Moravian Church and William Blake 1
- Co-authors
- Edmund S. Morgan (1 shared paper)Andrew Delbanco (2 shared papers)Richard L. Bushman (2 shared papers)Perry Miller (2 shared papers)Robert Middlekauff (1 shared paper)Edwin S. Gaustad (2 shared papers)Jay Fliegelman (1 shared paper)William G. McLoughlin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The New England Quarterly (4 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (2 papers)American Quarterly (1 paper)American Literature (1 paper)Journal of American History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Alan Heimert
12 papers receiving 75 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- History 50
- Religious studies 14
- Political Science and International Relations 63
- Anthropology 22
- Literature and Literary Theory 24
Countries citing papers authored by Alan Heimert
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Heimert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Heimert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Heimert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Heimert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Heimert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Heimert. The network helps show where Alan Heimert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Alan Heimert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1967 | 52 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 23 | |
| 3 | 1963 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1968 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1953 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1967 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1958 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1967 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 10 | The Puritans in America: A Narrative Anthology | 2009 | 6 |
| 11 | 1967 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1967 | 1 |
About Alan Heimert
Alan Heimert is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 13 papers that have together received 157 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Comics and Graphic Narratives (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper), Moravian Church and William Blake (1 paper), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper) and Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (50 citations), Religious studies (14 citations), Political Science and International Relations (63 citations), Anthropology (22 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (24 citations). Alan Heimert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edmund S. Morgan, Andrew Delbanco, Richard L. Bushman, Perry Miller, Robert Middlekauff, Edwin S. Gaustad, Jay Fliegelman, William G. McLoughlin, Darrett B. Rutman and Peter N. Carroll. Their work appears in journals such as The New England Quarterly, The William and Mary Quarterly, American Quarterly, American Literature and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.