Alan Archer-Boyd
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Noise Effects and Management
Papers in
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 5
-
- Noise Effects and Management 6
- Co-authors
- Matthew H. DavisBenedikt ZoefelRobert P. CarlyonTobias GoehringJohn M. DeeksJulie G. ArenbergRichard E. TurnerRosy Southwell
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (4 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Trends in Hearing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Alan Archer-Boyd
14 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Sensory Systems 71
- Speech and Hearing 92
- Cognitive Neuroscience 243
- Signal Processing 71
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Alan Archer-Boyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Archer-Boyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Archer-Boyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Archer-Boyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Archer-Boyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Archer-Boyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Archer-Boyd. The network helps show where Alan Archer-Boyd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alan Archer-Boyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 110 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 8 |
About Alan Archer-Boyd
Alan Archer-Boyd is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing, Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Communication, having authored 16 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (8 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (5 papers), Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques (2 papers), Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper) and Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (71 citations), Speech and Hearing (92 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (243 citations), Signal Processing (71 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (34 citations). Alan Archer-Boyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Matthew H. Davis, Benedikt Zoefel, Robert P. Carlyon, Tobias Goehring, John M. Deeks, Julie G. Arenberg, Richard E. Turner, Rosy Southwell, W. Owen Brimijoin and Jack A. Holman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Scientific Reports, Current Biology, BMJ Open and Trends in Hearing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.