John M. Deeks

58 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

John M. Deeks
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Sensory Systems 791
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Speech and Hearing 531
  • Signal Processing 430
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 233
Replace Dawn Burton Koch with:
Dawn Burton Koch United States
Ying-Yee Kong United States
Michelle L. Hughes United States
Peter Seligman Australia
Lendra Friesen Canada
Mary W. Lowder United States
Leonid M. Litvak United States
Francis Kuk United States
Kerrie Plant Australia
Lesley A. Whitford Australia
John M. Deeks relative to Dawn Burton Koch United States Dawn Burton Koch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Dawn Burton Koch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Deeks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Deeks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Deeks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Deeks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Deeks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Deeks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Deeks. The network helps show where John M. Deeks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Deeks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Deeks Line = papers co-authored together John M. Deeks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999265
2 2006102
3 200899
4 201096
5 200977
6 201068
7 200266
8 200260
9 200557
10 201054
11 200845
12 200740
13 199940
14 200438
15 201337
16 201936
17 201332
18 201831
19 202131
20 201830

About John M. Deeks

John M. Deeks is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Occupational Therapy, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (57 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (30 papers), Noise Effects and Management (23 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (21 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (16 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (791 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Speech and Hearing (531 citations), Signal Processing (430 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (233 citations). John M. Deeks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include Robert P. Carlyon, Olivier Macherey, Astrid Van Wieringen, Jan Wouters, Dorothy Bishop, Sonia J. Bishop, Christopher J. Long, Patrick Axon, Colette M. McKay and Stefano Cosentino. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research, Trends in Hearing and International Journal of Audiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026