J. Mark G. Williams
- Clinical Psychology top 0.05%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.05%
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Zindel V. SegalJohn D. TeasdaleCatherine CraneDanielle S. DugganFilip RaesThorsten BarnhoferDirk HermansGregory T. Smith
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (49 papers)Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (40 papers)Identity, Memory, and Therapy (33 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
J. Mark G. Williams
129 papers receiving 15.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
- Clinical Psychology 11.7k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7.5k
- Social Psychology 3.4k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.4k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.4k
Countries citing papers authored by J. Mark G. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Mark G. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Mark G. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Mark G. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Mark G. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Mark G. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Mark G. Williams. The network helps show where J. Mark G. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Mark G. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Mark G. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Mark G. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Mark G. Williams. J. Mark G. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 150 | |
| 5 | 56 | |
| 6 | 98 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 164 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 177 | |
| 11 | 100 | |
| 12 | 65 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 212 | |
| 15 | 89 | |
| 16 | 56 | |
| 17 | 256 | |
| 18 | 163 | |
| 19 | 136 | |
| 20 | Suicide and attempted suicide : understanding the cry of pain | 76 |
About J. Mark G. Williams
J. Mark G. Williams is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 130 papers that have together received 16.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (49 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (40 papers) and Identity, Memory, and Therapy (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (7.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (11.7k citations) and Applied Psychology (1.2k citations). J. Mark G. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Zindel V. Segal, John D. Teasdale, Catherine Crane, Danielle S. Duggan, Filip Raes, Thorsten Barnhofer, Dirk Hermans, Gregory T. Smith, Emily L. B. Lykins and Erin C. Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.