Frédéric Marmel
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 12
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 7
-
- Noise Effects and Management 6
- Co-authors
- Barbara Tillmann (5 shared papers)Alexandra Parbery‐Clark (2 shared papers)Nina Kraus (2 shared papers)Robert P. Carlyon (2 shared papers)Hedwig E. Gockel (2 shared papers)Christopher J. Plack (2 shared papers)Kathryn Hopkins (2 shared papers)Enrique A. Lopez‐Poveda (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Hearing Research (2 papers)Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (1 paper)Trends in Hearing (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (1 paper)Acta acustica united with Acustica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Frédéric Marmel
15 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Sensory Systems 98
- Cognitive Neuroscience 312
- Music 35
- Speech and Hearing 72
- Signal Processing 66
Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Marmel
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Marmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Marmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Marmel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Marmel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Marmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Marmel. The network helps show where Frédéric Marmel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Marmel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 0 |
About Frédéric Marmel
Frédéric Marmel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Music, Sensory Systems and Signal Processing, having authored 16 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (12 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (4 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (2 papers), Music and Audio Processing (2 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (98 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (312 citations), Music (35 citations), Speech and Hearing (72 citations) and Signal Processing (66 citations). Frédéric Marmel has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Tillmann, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, Nina Kraus, Robert P. Carlyon, Hedwig E. Gockel, Christopher J. Plack, Kathryn Hopkins, Enrique A. Lopez‐Poveda, W. Jay Dowling and Fabien Perrin. Their work appears in journals such as Hearing Research, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Trends in Hearing, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Acta acustica united with Acustica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.