Akira Arimoto
About
In The Last Decade
Akira Arimoto
55 papers receiving 589 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Political Science and International Relations 237
- Education 170
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 132
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 120
- General Health Professions 69
Countries citing papers authored by Akira Arimoto
This map shows the geographic impact of Akira Arimoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Akira Arimoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Akira Arimoto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Akira Arimoto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Akira Arimoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Akira Arimoto. The network helps show where Akira Arimoto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Akira Arimoto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Akira Arimoto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Akira Arimoto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Akira Arimoto. Akira Arimoto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 186 | |
| 5 | The Changing Nature of Academic Work from an International Comparative Perspective | 2 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Changing Academic Profession in the World from 1992 to 2007 (THE CHANGING ACADEMIC PROFESSION OVER 1992-2007 : INTERNATIONAL, COMPARATIVE, AND QUANTITATIVE PERSPECTIVES : Report of the International Conference on the Changing Academic Profession Project, 2009 : Keynote Speech 1) | 4 |
| 8 | International Implications of the Changing Academic Profession in Japan (The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative and Quantitative Perspectives : Report of the International Conference on the Changing Academic Profession Project, 2008 : Keynote Speech 1) | 1 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | The Changing Academic Profession in Japan : Its Origins, Heritage and Current Situation (Reports of Changing Academic Profession Project Workshop on Quality, Relevance, and Governance in the Changing Academia : International Perspectives : Changing Academic Profession : Country Reports) | 1 |
| 11 | Institutionalization of Faculty Development with a Focus on Japan (Reports of Changing Academic Profession Project Workshop on Quality, Relevance, and Governance in the Changing Academia : International Perspectives : COE Program Reports) | 2 |
| 12 | La Educación Superior en el mundo 2006 : la financiación de las universidades | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | WTO/GATs and Cross-Border Higher Education: Country Report Japan | 0 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Massification of Higher Education and Academic Reforms in Japan (Academic Reforms in the World : Situation and Perspective in the Massification Stage of Higher Education : Reports of the 1997 Six-Nation Higher Education Project Seminar : Country Reports) | 4 |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 7 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.