Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of V. Lynn Meek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Lynn Meek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Lynn Meek more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Lynn Meek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Lynn Meek. The network helps show where V. Lynn Meek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. Lynn Meek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. Lynn Meek.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. Lynn Meek based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with V. Lynn Meek. V. Lynn Meek is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nguyễn, Hương Thị Lan & V. Lynn Meek. (2015). Key Considerations in Organizing and Structuring University Research. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 46(1). 41–62.6 indexed citations
3.
Bentley, Peter James, Hamish Coates, Ian R. Dobson, Leo Goedegebuure, & V. Lynn Meek. (2012). Job satisfaction around the academic. 7.2 indexed citations
4.
Coates, Hamish, et al.. (2010). VET Leadership for the Future: contexts, characteristics and capabilities : research briefing.. ACEReSearch (Australian Council for Educational Research).1 indexed citations
5.
Goedegebuure, Leo, et al.. (2009). Diversity in Australian higher education: an empirical analysis. Australian universities' review. 51(2). 49–61.6 indexed citations
6.
Meek, V. Lynn. (2007). Competition and cooperation in Australian higher education research. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).3 indexed citations
7.
Meek, V. Lynn. (2006). History and Development of Australian Higher Education : An Overview (Reports of Changing Academic Profession Project Workshop on Quality, Relevance, and Governance in the Changing Academia : International Perspectives : Changing Academic Profession : Country Reports). 20. 63–77.1 indexed citations
Meek, V. Lynn, et al.. (2005). Performance indicators for assessing and benchmarking research capacities in univerisites. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).8 indexed citations
10.
Meek, V. Lynn. (2003). Market Coordination, Research Management and the Future of Higher Education in the Post-Industrial Era.. RUNE (Research UNE).12 indexed citations
11.
Meek, V. Lynn. (2000). Diversity and marketisation of higher education. Higher Education Policy. 13(1). 23–39.2 indexed citations
Goedegebuure, Leo, Frans Kaiser, Peter Maassen, et al.. (1994). International perspectives on trends and issues in higher education policy. Higher Education Policy. 315–348.2 indexed citations
15.
Goedegebuure, Leo, et al.. (1993). Hochschulpolitik im internationalen Vergleich : eine länderübergreifende Untersuchung.3 indexed citations
Goedegebuure, Leo & V. Lynn Meek. (1988). Change in higher education, the non-university sector : an international perspective : papers presented at the Ninth European Forum of the Association for Institutional Research (AIR), August, 1987 at the University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.