Harm op den Akker
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Hermie HermensMonique TabakValerie M. JonesSilke ter StalMiriam CabritaLean L KramerMiriam Vollenbroek-HuttenLex van Velsen
- Topics
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (17 papers)Digital Mental Health Interventions (16 papers)Physical Activity and Health (7 papers)
- Journals
- Computers in Human BehaviorInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthJournal of Medical Internet Research
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsPortugalSpain
In The Last Decade
Harm op den Akker
41 papers receiving 715 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Applied Psychology 313
- General Health Professions 287
- Human-Computer Interaction 149
- Artificial Intelligence 131
- Physiology 98
Countries citing papers authored by Harm op den Akker
This map shows the geographic impact of Harm op den Akker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harm op den Akker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harm op den Akker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harm op den Akker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harm op den Akker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harm op den Akker. The network helps show where Harm op den Akker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harm op den Akker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harm op den Akker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harm op den Akker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Harm op den Akker. Harm op den Akker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 110 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | Elckerlyc Goes Mobile Enabling Natural Interaction in Mobile User Interfaces | 4 |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | A Context-Aware Adaptive Feedback System for Activity Monitoring | 3 |
| 20 | 17 |
About Harm op den Akker
Harm op den Akker is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and General Health Professions, having authored 44 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (17 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (16 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (313 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (149 citations) and General Health Professions (287 citations). Harm op den Akker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Hermie Hermens, Monique Tabak, Valerie M. Jones, Silke ter Stal, Miriam Cabrita, Lean L Kramer, Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten, Lex van Velsen, Rieks op den Akker and Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.