Adam Robin

2.5k citations
49 papers · 1.8k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Adam Robin

45 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Adam Robin
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Developmental Neuroscience 541
  • Neurology 415
  • Genetics 398
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 377
  • Cancer Research 192
Replace Haipeng Xue with:
Haipeng Xue United States
Takayoshi Kanda Japan
Cindy T. J. van Velthoven United States
Chiara Cossetti United Kingdom
Dan Frenkel Israel
Robert J. Plunkett United States
Takayuki Nakagomi Japan
Robert W. Mays United States
Luca Peruzzotti‐Jametti United Kingdom
Takehiko Sunabori Japan
Adam Robin relative to Haipeng Xue United States Haipeng Xue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Haipeng Xue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Robin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Robin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Robin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Robin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Robin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Robin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Robin. The network helps show where Adam Robin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Robin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam Robin Line = papers co-authored together Adam Robin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005380
2 2005254
3 2014218
4 2004173
5 2007103
6 200486
7 200363
8 201857
9 200550
10 200442
11 201735
12 201635
13 202135
14 200334
15 200528
16 202027
17 202220
18 200414
19 201410
20 201510

About Adam Robin

Adam Robin is a scholar working on Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Neurology and Cancer Research, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (16 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (8 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (7 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (7 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (5 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (541 citations), Neurology (415 citations), Genetics (398 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (377 citations) and Cancer Research (192 citations). Adam Robin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Chopp, Mark Katakowski, Chunling Zhang, Mei Lü, Li Zhang, Jieli Chen, Hao Jiang, Lijie Zhang, Lei Wang and Yi Li. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Neuro-Oncology, Journal of Neuro-Oncology, World Neurosurgery and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact