John E. OʼToole
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 66
- Surgery top 1%
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 55
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 33
- Management of metastatic bone disease 16
- Spinal Hematomas and Complications 13
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 10
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 8
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 8
- Neurology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard G. FesslerKurt M. EichholzJoshua T. WewelManish K. KasliwalMick J. Perez-CruetDino SamartzisChris GillisPatrick Shih
- Journals
- Neurosurgery (26 papers)Neurosurgery Clinics of North America (9 papers)The Spine Journal (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John E. OʼToole
99 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.8k
- Surgery 2.1k
- Pharmacology 431
- Neurology 259
- Genetics 133
Countries citing papers authored by John E. OʼToole
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. OʼToole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. OʼToole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. OʼToole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. OʼToole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. OʼToole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. OʼToole. The network helps show where John E. OʼToole may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. OʼToole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 146 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 142 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 11 |
About John E. OʼToole
John E. OʼToole is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Neurology, Genetics and Pharmacology, having authored 105 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (66 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (55 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (33 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (16 papers), Spinal Hematomas and Complications (13 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.8k citations), Surgery (2.1k citations), Pharmacology (431 citations), Neurology (259 citations) and Genetics (133 citations). John E. OʼToole has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard G. Fessler, Kurt M. Eichholz, Joshua T. Wewel, Manish K. Kasliwal, Mick J. Perez-Cruet, Dino Samartzis, Chris Gillis, Patrick Shih, Ricardo B. V. Fontes and Lee A. Tan. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, The Spine Journal, World Neurosurgery and Journal of Neurosurgery Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.