Adam James Parker
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Co-authors
- Timothy J. SlatteryJulie A. KirkbyZoe WoodheadDorothy BishopPaul A. ThompsonSimon P. LiversedgeEva GutiérrezJoanne Taylor
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (9 papers)Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (5 papers)
- Journals
- The FASEB JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceVision Research
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Adam James Parker
21 papers receiving 163 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Cognitive Neuroscience 113
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 84
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 35
- Artificial Intelligence 33
- Human-Computer Interaction 22
Countries citing papers authored by Adam James Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam James Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam James Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam James Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam James Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam James Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam James Parker. The network helps show where Adam James Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam James Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam James Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam James Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam James Parker. Adam James Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | The Physiological and Psychological Benefits of CrossFit Training – A Pilot Study | 6 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Adam James Parker
Adam James Parker is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 165 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (9 papers) and Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (84 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (113 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (22 citations). Adam James Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Timothy J. Slattery, Julie A. Kirkby, Zoe Woodhead, Dorothy Bishop, Paul A. Thompson, Simon P. Liversedge, Eva Gutiérrez, Joanne Taylor, H. De Man and David P. Carey. Their work appears in journals such as The FASEB Journal, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Vision Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.