Vascular Pharmacology

1.8k papers and 45.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Vascular Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 45.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Vascular Pharmacology usually cover Molecular Biology (658 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (498 papers) and Physiology (422 papers) specifically the topics of Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (330 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (123 papers) and Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Vascular Pharmacology are Hartwig Wolburg, Andrea Lippoldt, Raffaele De Caterina, Ernesto L. Schiffrin, Yusof Kamisah, Kamsiah Jaarin, John D. Catravas, Rosalinda Madonna, Hawa Nordin Siti and Beata Wójciak‐Stothard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Vascular Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Vascular Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Vascular Pharmacology.

Countries where authors publish in Vascular Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Vascular Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Vascular Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vascular Pharmacology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025