Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine

2.0k papers and 62.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 62.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (962 papers), Molecular Biology (757 papers) and Surgery (386 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (281 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (149 papers) and Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine are Scott M. Grundy, Joseph L. Witztum, Jane A. Leopold, Klaus Ley, Hans Peter Gerber, Gera Neufeld, Steven M. Pogwizd, Kôji Uchida, Javier Mestas and Martin Biel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025