Current Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionUnited States
American Journal of NephrologyUnited States
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological ResearchBrazil
BMC Cardiovascular DisordersChina
Expert Opinion on PharmacotherapyUnited States
The Nephron journals/Nephron journalsUnited States
Cardiovascular Drugs and TherapyUnited States
Current Atherosclerosis ReportsUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · 1×
×0.610.6kCCM
×0.812.6kSURGE
×0.89.2kEDM
×0.89.2kMB
×0.76.6kEPIDE
Citations per year, relative to Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.