Journal of Pharmacological Sciences

3.2k papers and 72.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 72.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (1.5k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (704 papers) and Physiology (631 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (352 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (314 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (279 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences are Toshitaka Nabeshima, Kiyofumi Yamada, Hideo Hasegawa, Eishichi Miyamoto, Akihiko Wada, Sam Sik Kang, Hyun Pyo Kim, Kun Ho Son, Takashi Ikejima and Shin‐ichi Tashiro.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Pharmacological Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Pharmacological Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025