Philip Howell

36 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Philip Howell
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Geography, Planning and Development 101
  • Anthropology 79
  • History 66
  • Urban Studies 38
  • Sociology and Political Science 229
Replace Robert Aldrich with:
Robert Aldrich Australia
Kate Darian‐Smith Australia
Karen M. Morin United States
Tracey Lindberg New Zealand
Vera Norwood United States
Joseph Pugliese Australia
Jan Penrose United Kingdom
Kalliopi Nikolopoulou United States
Carolyn Strange Australia
Adi Ophir Israel
Philip Howell relative to Robert Aldrich Australia Robert Aldrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Robert Aldrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Howell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Howell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Howell. The network helps show where Philip Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Philip Howell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Howell Line = papers co-authored together Philip Howell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199379
2 201032
3 200431
4 200428
5 200027
6 200226
7
Geographies of regulation : policing prostitution in nineteenth-century Britain and the Empire
200924
8 200819
9 200018
10 199815
11
At Home and Astray: The Domestic Dog in Victorian Britain
201513
12 200112
13 200412
14 199111
15 201310
16 20039
17 20038
18 19958
19 20187
20 20186

About Philip Howell

Philip Howell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Anthropology, Cultural Studies and History, having authored 38 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (9 papers), Sex work and related issues (8 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (3 papers), European history and politics (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (101 citations), Anthropology (79 citations), History (66 citations), Urban Studies (38 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (229 citations). Philip Howell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Danny Dorling, John Langton, Ronald L. Martin, Bruce Campbell, David Lambert, Alan R. H. Baker, Hilda Kean, Karen S. Karp and Pat Hudson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Historical Geography, Environment and Planning D Society and Space, Social & Cultural Geography, Irish Historical Studies and Antipode.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact