Transplantation Reviews

872 papers and 14.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 872 papers published in Transplantation Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 14.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Transplantation Reviews usually cover Surgery (485 papers), Transplantation (431 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (196 papers) specifically the topics of Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (398 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (322 papers) and Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Transplantation Reviews are W. Land, Randall E. Morris, Christophe Legendre, Benjamin L. Woolbright, Hartmut Jaeschke, Teun van Gelder, Dirk Kuypers, José Luis Górriz, Alberto Martínez‐Castelao and Bruce Kaplan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Transplantation Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Transplantation Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Transplantation Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Transplantation Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Transplantation Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Transplantation Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transplantation Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025