Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

917 papers and 15.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 917 papers published in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 15.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (647 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (344 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (162 papers) specifically the topics of EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (365 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (269 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience are Hojjat Adeli, Mehran Ahmadlou, Lindsay M. Squeglia, Joanna Jacobus, Susan F. Tapert, Ute Strehl, Michael A. Nitsche, Min‐Fang Kuo, Martijn Arns and Nash N. Boutros.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical EEG and Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025