Journal of Family Nursing

700 papers and 13.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 700 papers published in Journal of Family Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Family Nursing usually cover Clinical Psychology (362 papers), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (252 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (251 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (252 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (211 papers) and Family Support in Illness (185 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Family Nursing are Catherine A. Chesla, Kathleen A. Knafl, Lorraine M. Wright, Janet A. Deatrick, Nancy J. Moules, Marie L. Lobo, Sharon A. Denham, Fabie Duhamel, Karen S. Lyons and Christopher S. Lee.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Family Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Family Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Family Nursing.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Family Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Family Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Family Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Family Nursing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025