Technology in Society

3.0k papers and 82.6k indexed citations

About

The 3.0k papers published in Technology in Society in the last decades have received a total of 82.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Technology in Society usually cover Sociology and Political Science (721 papers), Economics and Econometrics (624 papers) and Strategy and Management (496 papers) specifically the topics of Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (245 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (213 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (204 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technology in Society are Gavin Wright, Barney Cohen, David Doloreux, Dharun Kasilingam, Frank W. Geels, Mario Coccia, Henrik Skaug Sætra, Mostafa Al‐Emran, Tuğrul Daim and Mokter Hossain.

In The Last Decade

Technology in Society

2.6k papers receiving 74.2k citations

Countries where authors publish in Technology in Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technology in Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technology in Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technology in Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Technology in Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technology in Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technology in Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026