Studies in Travel Writing

326 papers and 425 indexed citations i.

About

The 326 papers published in Studies in Travel Writing in the last decades have received a total of 425 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Travel Writing usually cover History (214 papers), Sociology and Political Science (82 papers) and Anthropology (79 papers) specifically the topics of Travel Writing and Literature (191 papers), Philippine History and Culture (48 papers) and Religious Tourism and Spaces (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Travel Writing are Tim Youngs, Christine Devine, Paul Genoni, Neil L. Whitehead, Richard White, Robert Clarke, R. C. Bridges, Graham Huggan, Daniel Carey and Peter Bishop.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Travel Writing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Travel Writing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Travel Writing.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Travel Writing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Travel Writing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Travel Writing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Travel Writing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025