Peter Bishop

2.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
59 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Peter Bishop is a scholar working on Software, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Bishop has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Software, 15 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 13 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Peter Bishop's work include Software Reliability and Analysis Research (25 papers), Software Engineering Research (11 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (9 papers). Peter Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Software Reliability and Analysis Research (25 papers), Software Engineering Research (11 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (9 papers). Peter Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Peter Bishop's co-authors include Richard de Steiger, Carl Hewitt, Robin Bloomfield, Andrey Povyakalo, Peter Humphreys, Amy Kim, Stuart D. Anderson, Hessam Sadatsafavi, David Wright and Mélanie Revilla and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Computer and Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

In The Last Decade

Peter Bishop

54 papers receiving 929 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A universal modular ACTOR formalism for artificial intelligence

1973 473 citations Carl Hewitt, Peter Bishop et al. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Bishop United Kingdom	16	391	365	326	305	156	59	1.1k
Péter Müller Switzerland	21	278 0.7×	348 1.0×	324 1.0×	811 2.7×	227 1.5×	117	1.3k
Mauro Iacono Italy	16	514 1.3×	131 0.4×	435 1.3×	173 0.6×	48 0.3×	80	934
D. C. Ince United Kingdom	13	237 0.6×	393 1.1×	613 1.9×	467 1.5×	101 0.6×	38	1.2k
Rajib Mall India	18	400 1.0×	742 2.0×	689 2.1×	195 0.6×	74 0.5×	99	1.3k
Luigi Lavazza Italy	18	240 0.6×	524 1.4×	975 3.0×	512 1.7×	49 0.3×	135	1.4k
Emmanuel Letier United Kingdom	21	438 1.1×	725 2.0×	1.4k 4.4×	1.5k 5.0×	32 0.2×	46	2.1k
Luca Console Italy	22	428 1.1×	256 0.7×	427 1.3×	1.1k 3.7×	26 0.2×	73	1.8k
Vijay Kumar India	18	230 0.6×	299 0.8×	333 1.0×	109 0.4×	23 0.1×	102	933
Swapna S. Gokhale United States	23	706 1.8×	1.3k 3.7×	1.2k 3.6×	442 1.4×	59 0.4×	190	2.2k
Irene Moser Australia	17	156 0.4×	122 0.3×	166 0.5×	343 1.1×	15 0.1×	63	886

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bishop

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bishop

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bishop. The network helps show where Peter Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Bishop. Peter Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (2020). Repurposing the Green Belt in the 21st Century. UCL Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

2.

Davies, Clive E, et al.. (2019). Instrumentation of a bank of lysimeters: Sensors and sensibility. 425. 2 indexed citations

3.

Bloomfield, Robin, Peter Bishop, E. Butler, & Robert J. Stroud. (2018). Security-Informed Safety: Supporting Stakeholders with Codes of Practice. Computer. 51(8). 60–65. 4 indexed citations

4.

Bishop, Peter. (2016). Naturalistic Transcendentalism. 24(2). 207–219.

5.

Bishop, Peter, Robin Bloomfield, Bev Littlewood, et al.. (2014). A conservative bound for the probability of failure of a 1-out-of-2 protection system with one hardware-only and one software-based protection train. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 130. 61–68. 5 indexed citations

6.

Bishop, Peter, Robin Bloomfield, Ilir Gashi, & Vladimir Stanković. (2011). Diversity for Security: A Study with Off-the-Shelf AntiVirus Engines. City Research Online (City University London). 11–19. 26 indexed citations

7.

Bishop, Peter & Robin Bloomfield. (2005). Using a log-normal failure rate distribution for worst case bound reliability prediction. 237–245. 15 indexed citations

8.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (2004). An exploration of software faults and failure behaviour in a large population of programs. 101–112. 21 indexed citations

9.

Bishop, Peter. (2003). MC/DC based estimation and detection of residual faults in PLC logic networks. City Research Online (City University London). 3 indexed citations

10.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (1996). Data Communications for Engineers.

11.

Bishop, Peter. (1994). Residence On Earth: Anima Mundi and a Sense of Geographical 'Belonging'. Ecumene. 1(1). 51–64. 6 indexed citations

12.

Bishop, Peter. (1992). Rhetoric, Memory, and Power: Depth Psychology and Postmodern Geography. Environment and Planning D Society and Space. 10(1). 5–22. 14 indexed citations

13.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (1991). A random walk through software reliability theory. Clarendon Press eBooks. 83–111. 1 indexed citations

14.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (1990). Software diversity: Way to enhance safety?. Information and Software Technology. 32(10). 677–685. 6 indexed citations

15.

Bishop, Peter. (1989). Jung, Pure Land Buddhism and Psychological Faith. 22(2). 1–13. 1 indexed citations

16.

Redmill, Felix & Peter Bishop. (1988). Dependability of critical computer systems : guidelines produced by the European Workshop on Industrial Computer Systems, Technical Committee 7 (EWICS TC7). Elsevier eBooks. 2 indexed citations

17.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (1988). Probabilistic Modelling of Software Failure Characteristics. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 21(18). 87–93. 6 indexed citations

18.

Bishop, Peter, et al.. (1987). Fifth-Generation Computers-Concepts, Implementations, and Uses. IEEE Expert. 2(1). 93–93. 2 indexed citations

19.

Bishop, Peter. (1976). Microprocessors: Computing in miniature. Physics in Technology. 7(2). 47–53. 1 indexed citations

20.

Hewitt, Carl, Peter Bishop, & Richard de Steiger. (1973). A universal modular ACTOR formalism for artificial intelligence. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 235–245. 473 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact