Studia Phaenomenologica

244 papers and 563 indexed citations i.

About

The 244 papers published in Studia Phaenomenologica in the last decades have received a total of 563 indexed citations. Papers published in Studia Phaenomenologica usually cover Philosophy (141 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (45 papers) specifically the topics of Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (103 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (59 papers) and Philosophy and Historical Thought (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studia Phaenomenologica are Mădălina Diaconu, Tonino Griffero, Vincent Blok, Massimiliano Tarozzi, Bernhard Waldenfels, James Mensch, Jan Patočka, Robin D. Rollinger, Íngrid Vendrell Ferran and Natalie Depraz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studia Phaenomenologica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studia Phaenomenologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studia Phaenomenologica.

Countries where authors publish in Studia Phaenomenologica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studia Phaenomenologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studia Phaenomenologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studia Phaenomenologica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025